Friday, January 21, 2011

Has the Justice System Run Amuck in Maricopa, Arizona?
















A Foreign Public Minister of Justice, and Ambassador: David-Lehi, of a foreign corporation sole was stopped for a wide turn. This minor infraction has turned into a nightmare. Lehi was arrested for D.U.I. Although, he stated to the police that he had immunity, he was still processed. He presented his official credentials to the officer and they were simply ignored.

The Foreign Public Minister has undergone duress, cohesion, and threat of imprisonment to comply with the Scott Sully, Maricopa's Justice of the Peace's(J.P. #8) orders. This includes the wearing of a monitoring device. Even though the courts and the officer have violated several international laws and the law of nations in my opinion, and in the opinion of several others.

The Foreign Public Minister: David-Lehi Submitted his letter of appointment and his Foreign Public Minister Paperwork and it was overlooked as if it wasn't there. Apparently, the City of Maricopa doesn't recognize the unique status of diplomats.

Diplomatic immunity is a form of legal immunity and a policy held between governments, which ensures that diplomats are given safe passage and are considered not susceptible to lawsuit or prosecution under the host country's laws (although they can be expelled). It was agreed as international law in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961), though the concept and custom have a much longer history.
http://www.thefullwiki.org/Diplomatic_immunity

The CORPORATION SOLE: Under the English law corporations are distinguished in the first place as being either aggregate or sole. A corporation aggregate consists of several persons united in a society and maintained by a perpetual succession of members. A corporation sole consists of one person only, and the successors of that person in some particular station or office. The King of England is a corporation sole; so is a bishop; and in the Church of England every parson and vicar is, in view of the law, a corporation sole.
http://corporationsole.insights2.org/Corporation.html

In an unrelated matter. . .

This “citizen journalist” has also been charged with crimes stemming from a “non-incident“. I appeared before the same judge as David-Lehi.

I spent most of Thanksgiving weekend away from home. This fact didn’t stop Patricia A. Tejada Bonefield from filing a false complaint against me. As my readers may recall, I had issues with Bonefield because he insisted on letting his dogs freely roam my neighborhood contrary to animal regulations. His actions were the primary catalyst for me starting this Blogspot page. I wrote numerous articles referring Bonefield as a “scofflaw”. I also predicted that he would escalate this situation and he has.
http://vandal49588.blogspot.com/2009_06_21_archive.html

I was not home at the time of this alleged incident. I was over 40 miles away in another city. A summons to appear in court arrived in my mailbox some weeks later. To say the least, I was taken completely by surprise.

The CAD report from the PCSO:

101127112 Citizen Dispute DISORDERLY CONDUCT
Incident Address : 10000 BLOCK OF N WHITE RD MARICOPA
Time Reported: 13:08
Time Occurred between: 13:06:39 11/27/10 - 13:06:39 11/27/10
Cad Info: RP ADVS HIS NEIGHBOR , WAS YELLING AT HIS 101. NO WEAPONS OR INJURS INVOLVED.. JUST OCC.. RP WAS BEING DIFFICULT WITH THE CALL TAKER WOULD NOT GIVE THAT MUCH INFO.. RP IS REQ CTC. NFI REQ IF AK CHIN PD CAN ASSIST AK CHIN PD ADVS WILL SEND OFFICER OUT AK CHIN PD CALLED BACK AND OFC IS GOING TO SUMMONS THE OTHER PARTY SINCE HE WAS DC3

It appears that I have been accused of yelling at my neighbor and am being charged with disorderly conduct and harassment. I see red flags when a complainant is uncooperative with the dispatcher. A genuine victim should be forthcoming.

A federal judge has ruled in similar cases in Pennsylvania. Being an unpopular public figure that frequently says unpopular things, I often find myself under attack. As a result, my First Amendment Constitutional Rights are under direct threat as well.

No more citations for cursing in Pa.

PHILADELPHIA - Firing off a few four-letter words can't be charged as a crime anymore in Pennsylvania -- at least when state police are involved.

State police have agreed to stop citing the public for cursing as part of a settlement Tuesday of a federal free-speech lawsuit.

The American Civil Liberties Union represents Pennsylvanians who have been ticketed for cursing at an overflowing toilet, a swerving motorcyclist and a parking ticket issuer.
http://www.azcentral.com/offbeat/articles/2011/01/04/20110104pennysylvania-swearing-citations-halted.html#ixzz1BaZRbCgs

The defendants in the above cases have received monetary damages for being maliciously prosecuted. Perhaps there will be a sliver lining in this cloud. I would laugh if Bonefield would have to sell his house to settle a judgment.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” --First Amendment, Bill of Rights

4 comments:

  1. I was rather amused when I woke up this morning to see millions of gallons of irrigation water pour into Bonefield's yard. "God, seeing the wickedness of man, is grieved by his creation and resolves to send a great flood." Sometimes, there is justice of a sort. Ha! Ha!

    ReplyDelete
  2. February 10, 2011

    Somebody called animal control on me. They claimed my dogs were under nourished. The officer was greeted by Booger and Bailey at the gate. He said that this complaint is UNFOUNDED. Yet, another spiteful and malicious attack against me. What will they try next?

    All of us eat too much around here. That's the down side of being an exceptional cook. My dogs even like my salads.

    People lie to the cops about me all the time and always, the word "UNFOUNDED" comes up. I'm sure that business with the county prosecutor will be augmented by this latest FALSE accusation.

    “Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practice to deceive” --Sir Walter Scott

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Bonefields have long since absconded on debts and abandoned their home. These model citizens are deadbeats.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes, My Constitutional Rights were violated by a judge in court, justifying my involvement in a "White Civil Rights" organization and our need for such organizations...

    "... offends the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-recrimination. See State v. Hardwick, 183 Ariz. 649, 905 P.2d 1384 (App. 1995). Under the circumstances presented to this Court, the trial court's order requiring Appellant to write a letter of apology constitutes fundamental error.

    Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the trial court's order for Appellant to write a letter of apology and imposition of jail sentence for his failure to do so are set aside. This case is remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this opinion."

    ReplyDelete